What Happened to Indentured Servants After They Were Freed?

Consensual or punitive unpaid labor

An indenture signed by Henry Mayer, with an "X", in 1738. This contract bound Mayer to Abraham Hestant of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, who had paid for Mayer to travel from Europe.

Indentured servitude is a form of labor in which a person is contracted to work without salary for a specific number of years. The contract, chosen an "indenture", may be entered voluntarily for eventual compensation or debt repayment, or information technology may be imposed as a judicial penalty. Historically, it has been used to pay for apprenticeships, typically when an apprentice agreed to work for free for a master tradesman to learn a merchandise (similar to a modern internship but for a stock-still length of time, usually vii years or less). Later information technology was also used as a fashion for a person to pay the toll of transportation to colonies in the Americas.

Similar any loan, an indenture could be sold; most employers had to depend on middlemen to recruit and transport the workers, so indentures (indentured workers) were commonly bought and sold when they arrived at their destinations. Like prices of slaves, their price went up or downward depending on supply and demand. When the indenture (loan) was paid off, the worker was free. Sometimes they might be given a plot of land.

Indentured workers could usually ally, motion about locally every bit long as the work got done, read whatever they wanted, and take classes.

The Americas [edit]

North America [edit]

Until the belatedly 18th century, indentured servitude was common in British America. It was often a manner for Europeans (usually from Republic of ireland) to emigrate to the American colonies: they signed an indenture in return for a costly passage. All the same, the organization was as well used to exploit Asians (more often than not from India and China) who wanted to migrate to the New World. These Asian people were used mainly to construct roads and railway systems. Afterward their indenture expired, the immigrants were free to piece of work for themselves or another employer. Information technology has been theorized by at least 1 economist that indentured servitude occurred largely as "an institutional response to a upper-case letter market imperfection".[ane] In some cases, the indenture was made with a ship'south principal, who sold the indenture to an employer in the colonies. Virtually indentured servants worked equally farm laborers or domestic servants, although some were apprenticed to craftsmen.

The terms of an indenture were not always enforced past American courts, although runaways were normally sought out and returned to their employer.

Between one-half and two-thirds of European immigrants to the American colonies between the 1630s and American Revolution came under indentures.[2] However, while almost half the European immigrants to the Xiii Colonies were indentured servants, at any one fourth dimension they were outnumbered past workers who had never been indentured, or whose indenture had expired, and thus complimentary wage labor was the more prevalent for Europeans in the colonies.[3] Indentured people were numerically important mostly in the region from Virginia north to New Jersey. Other colonies saw far fewer of them. The total number of European immigrants to all xiii colonies before 1775 was near 500,000; of these 55,000 were involuntary prisoners. Of the 450,000 or so European arrivals who came voluntarily, Tomlins estimates that 48% were indentured.[4] Near 75% of these were under the age of 25. The age of adulthood for men was 24 years (not 21); those over 24 generally came on contracts lasting about 3 years.[5] Regarding the children who came, Gary Nash reports that "many of the servants were actually nephews, nieces, cousins and children of friends of emigrating Englishmen, who paid their passage in return for their labor in one case in America."[6]

Several instances of kidnapping[7] for transportation to the Americas are recorded, such as that of Peter Williamson (1730–1799). As historian Richard Hofstadter pointed out, "Although efforts were made to regulate or check their activities, and they diminished in importance in the eighteenth century, it remains true that a certain small part of the European colonial population of America was brought by strength, and a much larger portion came in response to deceit and misrepresentation on the part of the spirits [recruiting agents]."[8] 1 "spirit" named William Thiene was known to have spirited away[9] 840 people from Britain to the colonies in a single twelvemonth.[ten] Historian Lerone Bennett Jr. notes that "Masters given to flogging often did not intendance whether their victims were black or white."[11]

Likewise, during the 18th and early 19th centuries, children from the UK were frequently kidnapped and sold into indentured labor in the American and Caribbean colonies (frequently without any indentures).[12] [13]

Indentured servitude was also used by governments in United kingdom as a punishment for captured prisoners of war in rebellions and civil wars. Oliver Cromwell sent into indentured service thousands of prisoners captured in the 1648 Boxing of Preston and the 1651 Boxing of Worcester. Male monarch James 2 acted similarly after the Monmouth Rebellion in 1685, and apply of such measures continued into the 18th century.[ citation needed ]

Indentured servants could non marry without the permission of their master, were sometimes subject to physical punishment and did not receive legal favor from the courts. Female indentured servants in particular might be raped and/or sexually abused by their masters. If children were produced the labour would exist extended past ii years.[14] Cases of successful prosecution for these crimes were very uncommon, as indentured servants were unlikely to have access to a magistrate, and social force per unit area to avoid such brutality could vary past geography and cultural norm. The state of affairs was specially hard for indentured women, because in both depression social grade and gender, they were believed to be particularly prone to vice, making legal redress unusual.

The American Revolution severely limited immigration to the United States, but economic historians dispute its long-term impact. Sharon Salinger argues that the economical crisis that followed the state of war fabricated long-term labor contracts unattractive. His assay of Philadelphia's population shows how the per centum of bound citizens brutal from 17% to 6.iv% over the form of the state of war.[fifteen] William Miller posits a more moderate theory, stating that "the Revolution...wrought disturbances upon white servitude. But these were temporary rather than lasting".[xvi] David Galenson supports this theory by proposing that the numbers of British indentured servants never recovered, and that Europeans from other nationalities replaced them.[17]

The American and British governments passed several laws that helped foster the decline of indentures. The UK Parliament's Rider Vessels Act 1803 regulated travel conditions aboard ships to make transportation more than expensive, so as to hinder landlords' tenants seeking a better life. An American law passed in 1833 abolished the imprisonment of debtors, which fabricated prosecuting runaway servants more difficult, increasing the run a risk of indenture contract purchases. The 13th Subpoena, passed in the wake of the American Civil War, made indentured servitude illegal in the United States.

Contracts [edit]

Through its introduction, the details regarding indentured labor varied across import and export regions and most overseas contracts were made before the voyage with the understanding that prospective migrants were competent enough to make overseas contracts on their own account and that they preferred to have a contract before the voyage.[xviii]

Well-nigh labor contracts fabricated were in increments of five years, with the opportunity to extend some other five years. Many contracts also provided free passage home after the dictated labor was completed. Even so, in that location were generally no policies regulating employers in one case the labor hours were completed, which led to frequent ill-treatment.[18]

Caribbean [edit]

Indian woman in traditional dress

Indian woman in traditional wearing apparel

In 1643, the European population of Barbados was 37,200[19] (86% of the population).[20] During the Wars of the 3 Kingdoms, at least 10,000 Scottish and Irish prisoners of state of war were transported as indentured laborers to the colonies.[21]

A half million Europeans went equally indentured servants to the Caribbean (primarily the English-speaking islands of the Caribbean) before 1840.[22] [23]

In 1838, with the abolition of slavery at its onset, the British were in the process of transporting a meg Indians out of Bharat and into the Caribbean to take the place of the recently freed Africans (freed in 1833) in indentureship. Women, looking for what they believed would be a meliorate life in the colonies, were specifically sought afterward and recruited at a much higher rate than men due to the loftier population of men already in the colonies. However, women had to show their status as unmarried and eligible to immigrate, equally married women could not leave without their husbands. Many women seeking escape from calumniating relationships were willing to take that chance. The Indian Immigration Act of 1883[24] prevented women from exiting India as widowed or single in order to escape.[25] Arrival in the colonies brought unexpected conditions of poverty, homelessness, and picayune to no food as the high numbers of emigrants overwhelmed the small villages and flooded the labor market. Many were forced into signing labor contracts that exposed them to the hard field labor on the plantation. Additionally, on arrival to the plantation, single women were 'assigned' a homo as they were non allowed to live solitary. The subtle deviation betwixt slavery and indenture-ship is best seen here as women were still subjected to the command of the plantation owners likewise as their newly assigned 'partner'.[26]

Colonial Indian indenture system [edit]

The Indian indenture system was a arrangement of indenture, a form of debt bondage, by which two meg[27] Indians chosen coolies were transported to various colonies of European powers to provide labour for the (mainly sugar) plantations. Information technology started from the end of slavery in 1833 and continued until 1920. This resulted in the development of a large Indian diaspora, which spread from the Indian Ocean (i.e. Réunion and Mauritius) to Pacific Ocean (i.east. Fiji), besides every bit the growth of Indo-Caribbean and Indo-African population.

The British wanted local black Africans to work in Natal every bit workers. Merely the locals refused, and as a outcome, the British introduced the Indian indenture system, resulting in a permanent Indian South African presence. On 18 January 1826, the Government of the French Indian Ocean island of Réunion laid downwardly terms for the introduction of Indian labourers to the colony. Each human being was required to appear earlier a magistrate and declare that he was going voluntarily. The contract was for v years with pay of ₹8 (12¢ US)[ citation needed ] per month and rations provided labourers had been transported from Pondicherry and Karaikal. The get-go attempt at importing Indian labour into Mauritius, in 1829, concluded in failure, but by 1834, with abolition of slavery throughout most of the British Empire, transportation of Indian labour to the island gained pace. Past 1838, 25,000 Indian labourers had been transported to Republic of mauritius.

After the end of slavery, the Westward Indian sugar colonies tried the use of emancipated slaves, families from Ireland, Germany and Malta and Portuguese from Madeira. All these efforts failed to satisfy the labour needs of the colonies due to loftier mortality of the new arrivals and their reluctance to continue working at the finish of their indenture. On 16 November 1844, the British Indian Government legalised emigration to Jamaica, Trinidad and Demerara (Guyana). The first send, the Whitby, sailed from Port Calcutta for British Guiana on xiii January 1838, and arrived in Berbice on v May 1838. Transportation to the Caribbean stopped in 1848 due to issues in the saccharide manufacture and resumed in Demerara and Trinidad in 1851 and Jamaica in 1860.

This system of labour was coined by contemporaries at the time as a "new organisation of slavery", a term after used by historian Hugh Tinker in his largely influencial volume of the same name.[28]

The Indian indenture system was finally banned in 1917.[29] According to The Economist, "When the Indian Legislative Council finally ended indenture...it did and then because of pressure from Indian nationalists and failing profitability, rather than from humanitarian concerns."[29]

Oceania [edit]

Convicts transported to the Australian colonies before the 1840s oftentimes found themselves hired out in a form of indentured labor.[30] Indentured servants also emigrated to New Due south Wales.[31] The Van Diemen's Country Visitor used skilled indentured labor for periods of seven years or less.[32] A similar scheme for the Swan River area of Western Australia existed between 1829 and 1832.[33]

During the 1860s planters in Australia, Fiji, New Caledonia, and the Samoa Islands, in need of laborers, encouraged a merchandise in long-term indentured labor called "blackbirding". At the height of the labor merchandise, more than than half the adult male population of several of the islands worked away.[ citation needed ]

Over a menses of 40 years, from the mid-19th century to the early 20th century, labor for the sugar-cane fields of Queensland, Australia included an element of coercive recruitment and indentured servitude of the 62,000 South Sea Islanders. The workers came mainly from Melanesia – mainly from the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu – with a small number from Polynesian and Micronesian areas such as Samoa, the Gilbert Islands (later known equally Kiribati) and the Ellice Islands (subsequently known as Tuvalu). They became collectively known as "Kanakas".[ citation needed ]

Information technology remains unknown how many Islanders the trade controversially kidnapped. Whether the system legally recruited Islanders, persuaded, deceived, coerced or forced them to leave their homes and travel by ship to Queensland remains difficult to determine. Official documents and accounts from the period often disharmonize with the oral tradition passed downwards to the descendants of workers. Stories of blatantly trigger-happy kidnapping tend to relate to the start x–15 years of the trade.[ citation needed ]

Australia deported many of these Islanders dorsum to their places of origin in the period 1906–1908 under the provisions of the Pacific Island Labourers Act 1901.[34]

Commonwealth of australia's own colonies of Papua and New Guinea (joined afterwards the Second World War to form Papua New Republic of guinea) were the concluding jurisdictions in the globe to use indentured servitude.[ citation needed ]

Africa [edit]

A meaning number of construction projects in British Due east Africa and South Africa, required vast quantities of labor, exceeding the availability or willingness of local tribesmen. Indentured coolies from India were imported, for such projects as the Uganda Railway, as farm labor, and as miners. They and their descendants formed a pregnant portion of the population and economy of Kenya and Uganda, although not without engendering resentment from others. Idi Amin's expulsion of the "Asians" from Uganda in 1972 was an expulsion of Indo-Africans.[35]

The majority of the population of Mauritius are descendants of Indian indentured labourers brought in between 1834 and 1921. Initially brought to work the sugar estates following the abolition of slavery in the British Empire an estimated one-half a 1000000 indentured laborers were present on the island during this menstruum. Aapravasi Ghat, in the bay at Port Louis and now a UNESCO site, was the first British colony to serve as a major reception centre for indentured servants from India who came to work on plantations following the abolitionism of slavery.[36]

Legal status [edit]

The Universal Declaration of Human being Rights (adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948) declares in Article 4 "No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms".[37] More specifically, it is dealt with past commodity 1(a) of the United Nations 1956 Supplementary Convention on the Abolitionism of Slavery.

Nonetheless, only national legislation can plant the unlawfulness of indentured labor in a specific jurisdiction. In the United States, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (VTVPA) of 2000 extended servitude to encompass peonage likewise as Involuntary Servitude.[38]

Come across besides [edit]

  • Bracero programme
  • Coolie
  • Debt Bondage
  • English language Poor Laws
  • Human trafficking
  • Dwelling Children
  • Indenture (document)
  • Indentured servitude in Pennsylvania
  • Involuntary servitude
  • List of indentured servants
  • Padrone organization
  • Penal transportation
  • Redemptioner
  • Scottish poorhouse
  • Slavery
  • Irish indentured servants
  • United states labor law

Notes [edit]

  1. ^ Whaples, Robert (March 1995). "Where Is In that location Consensus Amongst American Economic Historians? The Results of a Survey on Twoscore Propositions". The Journal of Economic History. 55 (ane): 139–154. CiteSeerX10.1.1.482.4975. doi:10.1017/S0022050700040602. JSTOR 2123771. ...[the] vast majority [of economic historians and economists] take the view that indentured servitude was an economical organisation designed to iron out imperfections in the majuscule market.
  2. ^ Galenson 1984: 1
  3. ^ John Donoghue, "Indentured Servitude in the 17th Century English Atlantic: A Brief Survey of the Literature," History Compass (2013) 11#10 pp 893–902.
  4. ^ Christopher Tomlins, "Reconsidering Indentured Servitude: European Migration and the Early on American Labor Forcefulness, 1600–1775," Labor History (2001) 42#1 pp 5–43, at p.
  5. ^ Tomlins (2001) at notes 31, 42, 66
  6. ^ Gary Nash, The Urban Crucible: The Northern Seaports and the Origins of the American Revolution (1979) p 15
  7. ^ "trepan | trapan, n.2". OED Online. June 2017. Oxford Academy Press
  8. ^ Richard Hofstadter (1971). America at 1750: A Social Portrait. Knopf Doubleday. p. 36. ISBN9780307809650.
  9. ^ Lerone Bennett Jr. (November 1969). White Servitude in America. Ebony Mag. pp. 31–40.
  10. ^ Calendar of Land Papers: Colonial serial. Great U.k.. Public Tape Office. 1893. p. 521.
  11. ^ Calendar of State Papers: Colonial series. Great United kingdom. Public Record Part. 1893. p. 36.
  12. ^ The transported child
  13. ^ 'Horrid' and 'infamous' practices: the kidnapping and stripping of children, c.1730–c.1840
  14. ^ Race, gender, and power in America : the legacy of the Hill-Thomas hearings. Colina, Anita., Hashemite kingdom of jordan, Emma Coleman. New York: Oxford University Printing. 1995. ISBN0-nineteen-508774-7. OCLC 32891709. {{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  15. ^ Salinger, Sharon V. (1981). "Colonial Labor in Transition: The Decline of Indentured Servitude in Late Eighteenth‐Century Philadelphia". Labor History. 2. 22 (2): 165–191 [181]. doi:10.1080/00236568108584612.
  16. ^ Miller, William (1940). "The Furnishings of the American Revolution on Indentured Servitude". Pennsylvania History. 3. 7: 131–141 [137].
  17. ^ Galenson, David (1984). "The Rise and Fall of Indentured Servitude in the Americas: An Economical Assay". Journal of Economic History. 1. 44: 1–26 [13]. doi:x.1017/s002205070003134x. S2CID 154682898.
  18. ^ a b Walton, Lai. Indentured Labor, Caribbean Sugar. pp. 50–70.
  19. ^ Cutler, Cecilia (12 July 2017). Language Contact in Africa and the African Diaspora in the Americas: In honour of John 5. Singler. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 178. ISBN978-9027252777.
  20. ^ Population, Slavery and Economy in Barbados, BBC.
  21. ^ Higman 1997, p. 108.
  22. ^ Michael D. Bordo, Alan Thousand. Taylor, Jeffrey Thou. Williamson, eds. Globalization in historical perspective (2005) p. 72
  23. ^ Gordon K. Lewis and Anthony P. Maingot, Primary Currents in Caribbean Idea: The Historical Development of Caribbean Society in Its Ideological Aspects, 1492–1900 (2004) pp 96–97
  24. ^ "12 Feb 1883 – THE INDIAN Immigration ACT. – Trove". Trove.nla.gov.au. Retrieved 2022-03-18 .
  25. ^ Bahadur, Gaiutra (2014). Coolie Woman: The Odyssey of Indenture. United states: Chicago Press. p. 22. ISBN9780226211381.
  26. ^ Bahadur, Gaiutra (2014). Coolie Woman: The Odyssey of Indenture. U.s.: University of Chicago Press. p. 123. ISBN9780226211381.
  27. ^ Indentured labour from South asia (1834–1917) – 2013, Dr Sundari Anitha from the University of Lincoln and Professor Ruth Pearson from the University of Leeds, 'Hit Women: South Asian workers'
  28. ^ Tinker, Hugh (1974). A New System of Slavery: The Export of Indian Labour Overseas 1830–1920. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
  29. ^ a b "The legacy of Indian migration to European colonies". The Economist. 2 September 2017. Retrieved 2 September 2017.
  30. ^ Atkinson, James (1826). An account of the state of agriculture & grazing in New Southward Wales. London: J. Cross. p. 110. Retrieved 2012-xi-14 . On Sir Thomas Brisbane assuming the Regime, information technology was ordered, that all persons should, for every 100 acres of land granted to them, accept and keep one convict until the expiration or remission of his judgement.
  31. ^ Perkins, John (1987), "Convict Labour and the Australian Agricultural Visitor", in Nicholas, Stephen (ed.), The Convict Workers: Reinterpeting Commonwealth of australia'due south Past, Studies in Australian History, Cambridge University Press (published 1988), p. 168, ISBN9780521361262 , retrieved 2012-xi-14 , A characteristic of the Australian Agricultural Company'southward functioning at Port Stephens was the simultaneous employment [...] of various forms of labour. The original nucleus of the workforce consisted of indentured servants brought out from Europe on 7-twelvemonth contracts.
  32. ^ p.15 Duxbury, Jennifer Colonia Servitude: Indentured and Assigned Servants of the Van Diemen's Land Visitor 1825–1841 Monach Publications in History 1989
  33. ^ Fitch, Valerie Eager for Labour:The Swan River Indenture Hesperian Press 2003
  34. ^ "Documenting Republic". Foundingdocs.gov.au. Archived from the original on October 26, 2009. Retrieved 2009-07-04 .
  35. ^ Patel, Hasu H. (1972). "General Amin and the Indian Exodus from Uganda". Effect: A Journal of Opinion. 2 (4): 12–22. doi:10.2307/1166488. JSTOR 1166488.
  36. ^ "History". Government Portal of Mauritius. Retrieved 22 January 2015.
  37. ^ "Universal Announcement of Homo Rights". United Nations. Retrieved 2011-ten-14 .
  38. ^ "US Peonage and involuntary servitude laws". justice.gov. Retrieved 2011-10-14 .

References [edit]

  • Bahadur, Gaiutra (2014). Coolie Woman : The Odyssey of Indenture. The University of Chicago. ISBN978-0-226-21138-one.
  • Higman, B. W. (1997). Knight, Franklin W. (ed.). Full general History of the Caribbean: The slave societies of the Caribbean. Vol. 3 (illustrated ed.). UNESCO. p. 108. ISBN978-0-333-65605-one.
  • Galenson, David W. (March 1981). "White Servitude and the Growth of Black Slavery in Colonial America" (PDF). The Journal of Economic History. 41 (1): 39–47. doi:10.1017/s0022050700042728.
  • Galenson, David West. (June 1981). "The Marketplace Evaluation of Human Upper-case letter: The Case of Indentured Servitude" (PDF). Journal of Political Economy. 89 (3): 446–467. doi:x.1086/260980. S2CID 44248111.
  • Galenson, David (March 1984). "The Rise and Autumn of Indentured Servitude in the Americas: An Economic Assay". The Journal of Economic History. 44 (i): 1–26. doi:10.1017/s002205070003134x. S2CID 154682898.
  • Grubb, Farley (July 1985). "The Incidence of Servitude in Trans-Atlantic Migration, 1771–1804". Explorations in Economic History. 22 (three): 316–39. doi:10.1016/0014-4983(85)90016-6.
  • Grubb, Farley (Dec 1985). "The Market for Indentured Immigrants: Evidence on the Efficiency of Forward-Labor Contracting in Philadelphia, 1745–1773". The Periodical of Economic History. 45 (four): 855–868. doi:x.1017/s0022050700035130.
  • Grubb, Farley (Leap 1994). "The Disappearance of Organized Markets for European Immigrant Servants in the United States: Five Popular Explanations Reexamined". Social Science History. xviii (i): i–30. doi:10.2307/1171397. JSTOR 1171397.
  • Grubb, Farley (Dec 1994). "The Terminate of European Immigrant Servitude in the U.s.: An Economic Analysis of Market Plummet, 1772–1835". The Journal of Economical History. 54 (4): 794–824. doi:10.1017/s0022050700015497.
  • Tomlins, Christopher (2001). "Reconsidering Indentured Servitude: European Migration and the Early American Labor Force, 1600–1775". Labor History. 42 (one): v–43. doi:10.1080/00236560123269. S2CID 153628561.

Further reading [edit]

  • Abramitzky, Ran; Braggion, Fabio. "Migration and Human Upper-case letter: Cocky-Pick of Indentured Servants to the Americas," Journal of Economic History, (2006) 66#four pp 882–905, in JSTOR
  • Ballagh, James Curtis. White Servitude In The Colony Of Virginia: A Study Of The Arrangement Of Indentured Labor In The American Colonies (1895) excerpt and text search
  • Brown, Kathleen. Goodwives, Nasty Wenches & Broken-hearted Patriachs: gender, race and power in Colonial Virginia, U. of North Carolina Press, 1996.
  • Hofstadter, Richard. America at 1750: A Social Portrait (Knopf, 1971) pp 33–65 online
  • Jernegan, Marcus Wilson Laboring and Dependent Classes in Colonial America, 1607–1783 (1931)
  • Morgan, Edmund South. American Slavery, American Freedom: The Ordeal of Colonial Virginia. (Norton, 1975).
  • Nagl, Dominik. No Function of the Mother Land, but Distinct Dominions – Law, State Formation and Governance in England, Massachusetts und South Carolina, 1630–1769 (LIT, 2013): 515–535, 577f., 635–689.online
  • Salinger, Sharon V. To serve well and faithfully: Labor and Indentured Servants in Pennsylvania, 1682–1800. (2000)
  • Tomlins, Christopher. Liberty Jump: Law, Labor, and Civic Identity in English Colonization, 1580–1865 (2010); influential recent interpretation online review
  • Torabully, Khal, and Marina Carter, Coolitude: An Anthology of the Indian Labour Diaspora Anthem Press, London, 2002, ISBN i-84331-003-1
  • Torabully, Khal, Voices from the Aapravasi Ghat – Indentured imaginaries, verse collection on the coolie road and the fakir's aesthetics, Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund, AGTF, Mauritius, Nov two, 2013.
  • Wareing, John. Indentured Migration and the Servant Trade from London to America, 1618–1718. Oxford Oxford Academy Press, Feb 2017
  • Whitehead, John Frederick, Johann Carl Buttner, Susan E. Klepp, and Farley Grubb. Souls for Auction: Two German Redemptioners Come to Revolutionary America, Max Kade German-American Research Institute Series, ISBN 0-271-02882-3.
  • Zipf, Karin L. Labor of Innocents: Forced Apprenticeship in North Carolina, 1715–1919 (2005).

Historiography [edit]

  • Donoghue, John. "Indentured Servitude in the 17th Century English Atlantic: A Brief Survey of the Literature," History Compass (Oct. 2013) eleven#10 pp 893–902, doi:10.1111/hic3.12088

External links [edit]

  • https://u.k..news.yahoo.com/unfree-irish gaelic-caribbean-were-indentured-servants-not-slaves-072226285.html#8TTqXzc
  • https://medium.com/@Limerick1914/we-had-it-worse-eebe705c41a#.or9hof7pm
  • GUIANA 1838 – a film about indentured laborers
  • Voices from the Aapravasi Ghat, Khal TOrabully, https://web.archive.org/spider web/20150617164151/http://world wide web.potomitan.info/torabully/voices.php

watsondows1938.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servitude#:~:text=After%20their%20indenture%20expired%2C%20the,to%20a%20capital%20market%20imperfection%22.

0 Response to "What Happened to Indentured Servants After They Were Freed?"

Postar um comentário

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel